Where the War on Poverty began
Nestled in the hills of Eastern Kentucky, Martin County has had a long history tied to coal. Between 1918 and 2015, the county produced more than 436 million tons of coal. But as the coal industry died out, Martin County struggled. Nearly 40% of its population lives at or below the federal poverty level. The unemployment rate in the county is almost double the national rate.
But poverty has been endemic to the area for years. President Lyndon Johnson came here in 1964 to launch his War on Poverty.
“In 2018, in the very place where LBJ declared war on poverty … water is our number one issue. That’s hard to imagine,” said Gary Ball, editor-in-chief of the local weekly newspaper, The Mountain Citizen.
What’s happened in Martin County is a worst-case scenario that may be happening in other parts of the country, said Lindell Ormsbee, director of the Kentucky Water Resources Research Institute at the University of Kentucky.
“I think it’s somewhat of a systematic representation of what’s happening in a lot of other places where no one’s looking. It’s almost like the proverbial canary in the mine,” Ormsbee said.
What is happening?
A large part of the issue in Martin County is just hardware itself. There are about 300 miles of piping that deliver water across the county, placed up and over rocky terrain, making them even more susceptible to leaking. Today, more than half of the water that leaves the Martin County Water District treatment center doesn’t make it to the faucet.
When water systems are operating optimally, there is enough going through the pipes at a high enough pressure that debris from outside the pipe can’t make its way inside. Essentially, there’s so much water going through so quickly that even if there is a crack in the pipe, the water can act as a barrier. But as soon as that pressure drops or there’s less water going through the pipes, there is suddenly room for soil, debris and chemical residue to sneak into the drinking water.
And because of the leakage issues, the Water District hasn’t been able to flush the water lines clean in years, said Joe Burns of the Kentucky Rural Water Association. “As far as systematic lines, it’s been years since it’s even been able to be accomplished.”
Burns’ group is working with the Martin County Water District to help make improvements as best as they can. They’ve been able to reduce the levels of byproduct contaminants to under federal limits by simply changing where they add the chlorine.
But on top of issues with the lines, there are upgrades to the water treatment facilities, pumps and meters that still need to be made.
Investments in hardware and software are needed
For a financially struggling municipality, it is hard to find resources outside raising water rates, which is difficult for a community of people who mostly live on a limited income.
Infrastructure isn’t just pipes and hardware, Ormsbee said; it also includes financial and technical management.
Small water systems, such as Martin County, that serve less than 10,000 customers supply water to nearly
20% of the country. In addition to infrastructure and financial challenges, many of these systems can have a difficult time attracting the technical expertise to help. In fact, small systems made up
72% of EPA violations in 2015 and 2016.
Some citizens in Martin County feel that they’ve been forgotten. “Appalachia has been at the forefront in helping to improve this country for many years. … We’ve sent people to die in all of our country’s wars. We’ve populated this country with people in all industries,” Lafferty said. “We are Americans, too.”
Ball points to a new government center and a business complex in Inez, the county seat. The cost is nearly $20 million, money that he said could have been spent on upgrading the water system.
Some relief
Recently, Martin County received federal grants amounting to $3.4 million to go toward its water system. Experts believe that overhauling the system would take $13.5 million to $15 million.
Follow CNN Health on Facebook and Twitter
See the latest news and share your comments with CNN Health on Facebook and Twitter.
President Trump’s infrastructure proposal gives some residents hope. The $1.5 trillion plan touted by the White House is supposed to cover all infrastructure upgrades in the nation, but experts believe that it would cost the country $1 trillion just to maintain and meet the demands for drinking water for the next 25 years.
Critics further point out the White House’s plan earmarks only $200 billion in federal investment. The remainder is to be made up by the states and the private sector.
“Time will tell,” Lafferty said. “Politicians should remember that ‘forgotten people’ usually have long memories.”