Four Places Putting Green Infrastructure to Work for Local Communities
Figure 1. A map shows areas that would be flooded by 1.5 meters of sea-level rise, which is how much sea levels could rise by 2100 if emissions aren’t curtailed.
Water is a source of growing tension and violence in places where it’s scarce.
At the same time, sea-level rise and flooding threaten millions of people living near coastlines and low-lying areas. Traditional infrastructure such as concrete dams and seawalls isn’t sufficient to protect people from these multiplying threats.
Green infrastructure harnesses natural systems such as forests, floodplains, wetlands, soils and mangroves to enhance water supply, flood management, hydropower and irrigation. For example, vegetation and pervious soils can slow rising tides and hold water in one place for better management. The economic, social and environmental benefits of using green infrastructure has been documented in many cases, including in Europe, China and the United States.
A new report by the World Bank and World Resources Institute, “Integrating Green and Gray: Creating Next Generation Infrastructure” (www.wri.org/publication/integrating-green-gray), provides guidance on how to design green infrastructure in combination with built infrastructure to yield lasting environmental and economic benefits. The report calls for integrating natural systems into the next generation of infrastructure investments and describes 12 case studies of places putting green infrastructure to work. We highlight four of them in this article and illustrate their importance with open data from Resource Watch.
1. Vietnam: Defending the Mekong Delta with Mangroves
More than 20 percent of Vietnam’s population live in the Mekong Delta, and most of the population is reliant on rice farming and shrimp aquaculture. Mangrove forests protect residents of the Mekong Delta against erosion and flooding, but the mangroves have rapidly declined through time, in part due to the pressures of shrimp farming and urbanization.
Sea-level rise threatens highly populated areas in the Mekong Delta. Figure 1 (above) shows areas that would be flooded by 1.5 meters of sea-level rise, which is how much sea levels could rise by 2100 if emissions aren’t curtailed. The sea-level rise data are from Climate Central and population data are from the European Commission Joint Research Centre. Mangroves also can be seen on this map (provided by the United Nations Environment Program), although smaller-scale mangrove restoration projects are not represented.
Traditional coastal protection uses sea dikes, which are artificial walls built of rocks or concrete; but a new project harnesses the coastal protection functions of mangroves as a green infrastructure in combination with sea dikes.
Mangrove protection measures also have the potential to benefit farmers by protecting aquaculture operations from erosion and saltwater intrusion. Vietnam’s Mekong Delta Integrated Climate Resiliency and Sustainable Livelihood Project implemented by the government of Vietnam with support from the World Bank has encouraged local farmers to shift from intensive shrimp farming to methods that incorporate mangroves, and these methods allow farmers to apply for international certification as sustainable seafood farmers.
2. United States: Greening the Capitol’s Sewer System
The sewer system in Washington, D.C., is more than 100 years old, and when excess sewage and stormwater drain into the system, it flows directly into local waterways, which harms local ecosystems. Expansion of impervious surfaces from increased urbanization in recent decades has exacerbated this issue. Data on the extent of impervious surfaces from the NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center are shown in Figure 2.
In the early 2000s, excess stormwater was flowing into waterways in such high volume and frequency that D.C. was in violation of the U.S. Clean Water Act and the terms of pollutant regulations set by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). In 2005, D.C. developed a $2.6 billion plan with the EPA to develop infrastructure to remediate the stormwater issues, including three deep tunnels under the city in the Anacostia, Potomac and Rock Creek watersheds.
To incentivize investment in natural infrastructure, the D.C. water authority set up a $25 million bond to reduce the financial risk associated with green infrastructure projects. The bond will reward investors if green infrastructure performs well as well as limit financial risk to the water authority if the project underperforms. The pilot project uses the bond to fund green infrastructure improvements such as rain gardens, green roofs and green spaces to the Rock Creek watersheds. After construction completes in 2019, results will be monitored to see if there’s an increase in water retention sufficient to meet EPA standards, which could eliminate the need for the deep tunnel. If successful, the project could be used as an example of how other municipalities could minimize the risk of investing in green infrastructure and yield payouts for local communities and investors.
3. Sri Lanka: Investing in Wetlands in Colombo
Colombo is the financial hub of Sri Lanka and has undergone rapid urban development in recent decades, sometimes at the expense of wetlands that protect the city from flooding. The surrounding metro area of Colombo represents about half of the national GDP. During the last 10 years, water-holding capacity of wetlands surrounding the city decreased 40 percent, which puts the region and nation in economic risk from flooding and sea-level rise.
According to the World Bank, if Colombo was to lose all its wetlands, the metro region would risk losing an average of 1 percent of its GDP each year due to flood damage.
The Metro Colombo Urban Development Project, funded by the World Bank and partners, identified 2,000 hectares of wetlands as important for water-holding capacity for Colombo. The project also established the city’s first urban wetland park: Beddegana, 18 hectares of wetland that provides important habitat for plants and animals and also regulates the temperature of surrounding areas from evaporative cooling. This service is important because the built-up nature of the metro area makes it 1 degree Celsius hotter in the summer than surrounding areas, according to data from the Center for International Earth Science Information Network.
4. Costa Rica: Restoring Hydropower with Forest Restoration
Costa Rica is paying landowners directly to incentivize them to conserve and restore forests to reduce sedimentation of reservoirs and restore the health of the country’s hydropower infrastructure.
Costa Rica went through a major period of deforestation in the 1980s. Forest loss led to increased soil erosion and sedimentation in reservoirs, which threatened the country’s hydropower that supplies three quarters of national demand.
In 1996, Costa Rica’s Ministry of Environment and Energy set up payment for an ecosystem services program to pay landowners to protect and restore forests. From 1996 to the end of 2017, more than 17,000 contracts were signed by landowners, and 280,000 hectares were enrolled in the program. According to the World Bank, about half of Costa Rica’s land currently is covered by forest, compared to just 26 percent in 1983.
Editor’s Note: This article originally appeared on WRI’s Resource Watch platform at resourcewatch.org. Please visit the site for additional information on this important topic.